What link type is required when the GCS is NOT co-located with the Satellite Earth Terminals (SETSS)?

The correct choice is remote split operations. In a scenario where the Ground Control Station (GCS) is not co-located with the Satellite Earth Terminals (SETSS), there is a need for a communication setup that allows for effective operation over a significant distance. Remote split operations enable the GCS to maintain control of the MQ-9 while communicating with the satellite systems that relay data to and from the aircraft.

This method allows operators to engage with the unmanned vehicle without requiring physical proximity to the ground-based systems. It is essential for ensuring that the command and control functions are performed efficiently while managing the UAV's operations from a separate location. This capability is particularly important for missions that demand flexible and decentralized operational setups.

Other link types, such as line of sight, ku-satcom, and direct connection, may not be as effective in this context. Line of sight often requires direct visibility between the control station and the UAV, which is not feasible if the GCS is far from the SETSS. Ku-satcom refers to the type of satellite communication link used but does not address the operational separation between the GCS and SETSS. Direct connection implies a physical link, which would negate the need for remote operation.